One chain to a page, in the sequence a file actually moves: intake, the carrier’s answer, treatment, the medical-legal dispute, the Board case, resolution — then the five that recur throughout and belong to no point in it. Each page carries what happened, the clock it starts, who does what by when, the file note to record it, and every template in the library that serves it. Each page carries what happened, the clock it starts, who does what by when, the file note to record it, and every template in the library that serves it. 34 chains, printed 8.5×11 portrait. 2 run onto a second sheet — The case opens and The carrier answers the claim — and say so at the foot, so 36 sheets in all.
| Chain | Doc | Clock | Posture | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The case opens | APP-ADJ |
— | Routine |
| 2 | The carrier answers the claim | BENEFITS |
75 days | They moved |
| 3 | A letter arrives from the other side | CORR |
— | They moved |
| 4 | The treating doctor decides something | PR2 |
20 days | They moved |
| 5 | Treatment is refused | UR-DENIAL |
10 days | They moved |
| 6 | The carrier defers the review | UR-DENIAL |
— | They moved |
| 7 | A panel is assigned | QME |
10 days | They moved |
| 8 | No appointment can be had | QME |
90 days | We moved |
| 9 | Records go to the evaluator | MEDREC |
20 days BEFORE | Either side |
| 10 | The evaluator reports | PQME |
30 days | They moved |
| 11 | The case opens at the Board | APP-ADJ |
1 year | Fatal if late |
| 12 | Written discovery arrives | DISCOVERY |
— | They moved |
| 13 | A deposition is noticed | DEPO-NOTICE |
not before 10 days | They moved |
| 14 | Records are subpoenaed | SDT |
not before 20 days | We moved |
| 15 | Medical records come in | MEDREC |
20 days | They moved |
| 16 | Work is offered | BENEFITS |
— | They moved |
| 17 | The case is set for hearing | DOR |
— | Either side |
| 18 | The case ends | CR |
— | We moved |
| 19 | The judge wants more before approving | ORDER |
— | They moved |
| 20 | The Board decides | ORDER |
20 days | They moved |
| 21 | Is it final, or interlocutory? | ORDER |
— | They moved |
| 22 | Money moves | BENEFITS |
— | Routine |
| 23 | The fee is decided | PET |
— | We moved |
| 24 | A provider claims against the case | LIEN |
18 months | They moved |
| 25 | The injury gets worse | PET |
5 years | Fatal if late |
| 26 | A petition for serious and willful misconduct | PET |
1 year | Fatal if late |
| 27 | The prior disability is at issue | SIBTF |
— | We moved |
| 28 | The injured worker dies | APP-ADJ |
1 year | Fatal if late |
| 29 | The case closes and the file does not | CORR |
— | Routine |
| 30 | The client is kept told | CORR |
— | Routine |
| 31 | Something is served | POS |
— | Routine |
| 32 | Representation changes | CORR |
— | Routine |
| 33 | The Board sends paper | NOH |
— | Routine |
| 34 | Stationery and firm records | AUTH |
— | Routine |
Find what is in your hand. The badge is how long you have; the chain is the page that says what to do. Shortest first.
| Document | Tab | Time | Go to |
|---|---|---|---|
DEPO-NOTICEdeposition notice / transcript |
12 | 10 days | A deposition is noticed |
DEPO-TXdeposition notice / transcript |
12 | 10 days | A deposition is noticed |
QMEQME / panel QME report — PQME when the evaluator came from a panel, QME otherwise; also the panel, strike and appointment paper (Descriptor says which) |
7/6 | 10 days | A panel is assigned |
UR-DENIALutilization review decision. Deferral and delay are filed as UR-DENIAL with Descriptor Deferral / Delay until the vocabulary gains their own codes (see gaps below). When several match, the most adverse wins: denial over modification over approval. |
8 | 10 days | Treatment is refused |
UR-MODutilization review decision. Deferral and delay are filed as UR-DENIAL with Descriptor Deferral / Delay until the vocabulary gains their own codes (see gaps below). When several match, the most adverse wins: denial over modification over approval. |
8 | 10 days | Treatment is refused |
MEDRECmedical records, imaging, operative reports, records returned on subpoena |
5/13 | 20 days BEFORE | Records go to the evaluator |
OACRproposed order / award |
14 | 20 days | The Board decides |
ORDERan order of the Board (approving, to show cause, dismissal, findings & award, the judge's Report & Recommendation — Board-issued paper on reconsideration) |
2/14 | 20 days | The Board decides |
PR2treating physician progress / permanent & stationary reports |
5/7 | 20 days | The treating doctor decides something |
SDTsubpoena duces tecum / subpoena |
13 | 20 days | Records are subpoenaed |
SUBPOENAsubpoena duces tecum / subpoena |
13 | 20 days | Records are subpoenaed |
AMEagreed medical evaluator report; AME agreement and appointment paper |
7/6 | 30 days | The evaluator reports |
PQMEQME / panel QME report — PQME when the evaluator came from a panel, QME otherwise; also the panel, strike and appointment paper (Descriptor says which) |
7/6 | 30 days | The evaluator reports |
BENEFITSbenefit notice (claim accepted/denied/delayed; TD/PD notices; offer of work; SJDB) |
1/10/11 | 75 days | The carrier answers the claim |
APP-ADJapplication for adjudication (and amended) |
2 | 1 year | The case opens at the Board |
LIENlien claim |
15 | 18 months | A provider claims against the case |
PETpetition (reconsideration, reopen, removal, penalties…) — the exact petition in the Descriptor |
2 | 5 years | The injury gets worse |
132ALabor Code §132a petition |
2 | — | Is it final, or interlocutory? |
ANSWERanswer to the application |
2 | — | The case opens at the Board |
AUTHHIPAA : the client's blanket release and representative designation signed at intake → cover. AUTH : an authorization executed for one specific records request → 13 |
13/cover | — | Stationery and firm records |
CORRcorrespondence — a letter, or a document that has no code of its own yet (the gaps note) |
4/2/6/7/11/12/13/14/15/cover | — | The client is kept told |
CRcompromise and release |
14 | on its own date | The case ends |
DFRdoctor's first report |
5 | — | The treating doctor decides something |
DISCOVERYwritten discovery — interrogatories, requests for admission, requests for production served by a party |
12 | — | Written discovery arrives |
DORdeclaration of readiness to proceed (regular or expedited) |
3 | on its own date | The case is set for hearing |
HIPAAHIPAA : the client's blanket release and representative designation signed at intake → cover. AUTH : an authorization executed for one specific records request → 13 |
13/cover | — | Stationery and firm records |
IMR-APPthe completed application — the firm's appeal packet (the blank served form stays with the UR decision at Tab 8 and takes no code) |
9 | — | Treatment is refused |
IMR-DETnotice of assignment / request for information / determination |
9 | on its own date | The carrier defers the review |
IMR-NOAnotice of assignment / request for information / determination |
9 | — | The carrier defers the review |
IMR-RFInotice of assignment / request for information / determination |
9 | — | The carrier defers the review |
MOHminutes of hearing |
3 | — | The case is set for hearing |
MSCpaper specific to a mandatory settlement conference that is neither the notice ( NOH ), the minutes ( MOH ) nor the statement ( PTCS ): a continuance request, an MSC-day settlement worksheet (an MSC order is ORDER , Tab 2) |
3 | — | The case is set for hearing |
NOHnotice of hearing (MSC, trial, expedited, lien conference) |
3/15 | — | The Board sends paper |
POSproof of service |
3/6 | — | Something is served |
PR3treating physician progress / permanent & stationary reports |
5/7 | — | The treating doctor decides something |
PR4treating physician progress / permanent & stationary reports |
5/7 | — | The treating doctor decides something |
PTCSpre-trial conference statement |
3 | — | The case is set for hearing |
RFArequest for authorization |
5 | — | Treatment is refused |
SIBTFSubsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund application |
2 | — | The prior disability is at issue |
STIPstipulations with request for award |
14 | — | The case ends |
UR-APPROVALutilization review decision. Deferral and delay are filed as UR-DENIAL with Descriptor Deferral / Delay until the vocabulary gains their own codes (see gaps below). When several match, the most adverse wins: denial over modification over approval. |
8 | — | Treatment is refused |
our filing, on a clock nobody chose — miss it and the claim is barred
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
the attorney picks the date; late here is a decision, not an accident
the same exchange whichever side began it, and both are on a clock
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
A client signs up
The carrier answers the claimthe claim form goes to the carrier
A letter arrives from the other sidethe other side begins writing to the firm
The authorisation and designation are the two that stop later work if missed — both go in every IMR packet, months later.
Create the contact — name, DOB, SSN, address, phone, email, preferred language; flag if an interpreter is needed. Create the matter — case type, jurisdiction, venue, side represented. Assign the handling attorney, paralegal and case manager. Record the referral source.
Matter opened from the intake questionnaire dated {date}. Client, employer and carrier entered as parties.
Enter the date of injury, the injury type (cumulative trauma or specific), and the CT date range if cumulative. Enter every body part with laterality. Enter the occupation and the injury description in the client’s own words.
Injury entered: {DOI}, {CT or specific}, {body parts}. Taken from the questionnaire; not yet verified against a medical record.
Assemble the client packet — welcome letter, what to expect, how to document expenses — and send it with the signed fee agreement.
Welcome packet and fee agreement sent to the client {date}, by {mail or email}.
Generate the authorizations, send them to the client for signature, and diary for their return. Nothing can be requested on the client’s behalf until they come back signed.
HIPAA, medical release and signature authorization sent for signature {date}. Diaried for return.
Ask the client whether the employer gave them a DWC-1 and whether they returned it. If it was never given, generate it and serve it. Record the date the completed form went back to the employer.
DWC-1 {given / not given} to the client. Completed form returned to the employer {date}. 90-day presumption calendared from that date.
Serve the employer and the carrier. Serve the treating doctor with a records request at the same time. File the proof of service.
Notice of representation served on {employer} and {carrier} {date}. Proof of service filed. Records request sent to {doctor}.
Check the average weekly wage against pay stubs or an employer wage statement. Confirm the employer’s legal name and address. Check the date of injury against a medical record. Check for concurrent employment, prior injuries to the same body parts, and other pending claims.
Average weekly wage verified at {amount} against {pay stubs / wage statement}. Employer legal name confirmed as {name}.
Send a records release to every provider the client named. Request the personnel file and the wage records from the employer.
Records requested from {providers} {date}. Personnel file and wage records requested from the employer.
Determine whether an MPN applies and write to the client explaining what it means. Check whether the client predesignated a personal physician. Confirm who is treating now.
MPN {applies / does not apply}. Predesignation {on file / none}. Treating physician confirmed as {doctor}.
Calendar the one-year statute and the five-year statute from the date of injury. Set a 30-day file review and a status call with the client.
One-year statute calendared {date}. Five-year statute calendared {date}. 30-day review set.
Ask the client directly: did the employer hand you a claim form, and did you fill it in and give it back? Get the dates. An employer who never provided one has not started the clock, and the client may not know that.
Client states the DWC-1 was {given / never given} on {date} and returned on {date}. {Copy on file / none}.
If the employer never provided a claim form, generate one, have the client complete and sign the employee section, and serve it on the employer. Keep proof of how and when it went.
DWC-1 completed by the client and served on {employer} on {date} by {method}. Proof of service filed.
Enter the date the completed form went back to the employer. Every clock on this page runs from it. If the date cannot be established, say so on the file rather than entering a guess.
DWC-1 filing date recorded as {date}, taken from {the signed form / the client / the employer’s copy}.
Calendar the ninety-day presumption from the filing date, assigned to the attorney. Set a fourteen-day check that benefits have started. If this is a presumptive injury, ask the attorney whether the seventy-five day period applies before calendaring it.
Ninety-day presumption calendared to {date}. Fourteen-day benefits check set. Presumptive injury: {yes — 75 days / no}.
The employer must forward the completed form to the claims administrator within one working day. Confirm it arrived and get the claim number. A form sitting on a supervisor’s desk is a claim nobody is adjusting.
Employer forwarded the DWC-1 to {carrier} on {date}. Claim number {number} obtained.
Add the carrier as a party with the claim number and policy number. Add the adjuster with a direct line. Take these from the carrier’s own paper — the delay letter, the benefit notice — not from what the client remembers.
Carrier {name} added with claim number {number}. Adjuster {name}, {phone}.
Check whether benefits have started, whether treatment is being authorized, and whether a delay or denial letter has arrived. If nothing has happened and the ninety days are running, tell the attorney.
Carrier status at {date}: benefits {started / not started}, treatment {authorized / not}, {delay / denial / nothing} received.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The case opensthe claim form goes to the carrier
Acceptance, denial or delay
1, 10, 11 — the claim itself (acceptance, denial, delay) → 1; a rate, an offer or a voucher → 10; a check → 11
The case opens at the Boarddenied, delayed, or benefits are disputed
The injured worker diesthe injured worker dies
The treating doctor decides somethingaccepted — treatment proceeds
90 days — 75 for the presumptive injuries of LC 3212–3213.2
from the date the claim form (DWC-1) is filed with the employer
LC 5402(b)
90 days ordinarily · 75 days as the exception. Ninety days is the ordinary period. Seventy-five applies ONLY to the presumptive injuries of LC 3212–3213.2 — the safety-member presumptions. The badge shows the shorter because it is the one that can be missed; the tasks describe the ninety because that is the usual case.
An acceptance is rarely unqualified. Read which body parts are admitted and which are not, whether the acceptance is for medical treatment only, and whether any period is disputed. Enter only what the letter admits.
Acceptance received {date}. Admitted: {body parts}. Not admitted: {body parts}. {Full acceptance / medical only / period disputed}.
Mark the presumption satisfied and record the date it closed. Keep the closed record; do not delete it.
Ninety-day presumption satisfied by acceptance dated {date}. Statute closed, record retained.
Check the temporary disability rate on the notice against the average weekly wage the file already verified. A rate set from the carrier’s wage figure rather than the true earnings is the most common and most quietly costly error in an accepted claim.
TD rate on the notice: {amount}. Rate from the file’s verified AWW: {amount}. {Agrees / disputed — objection sent}.
Set the fourteen-day check for the first payment, and a recurring fourteen-day diary after it. Confirm the client received it and knows what it is.
First TD payment due {date}. Diary set. Client told what to expect and when.
Write to the client: the claim is accepted, what that does and does not mean, what benefits should now start, and what to do if a payment does not arrive. Acceptance is the moment a client is most likely to think the case is over.
Client written to {date} explaining the acceptance and the benefits that follow.
An accepted claim should mean authorized treatment. Confirm the treating physician can get requests approved and that the MPN, if one applies, has a doctor the client can actually see.
Treatment authorization confirmed with {provider} on {date}. MPN {applies / does not}.
With liability admitted, the case turns on permanent disability and future medical care. Decide whether to file the Application now, whether a panel is needed, and when the client should be evaluated.
Posture after acceptance: {file Application / hold}. Panel {requested / not yet}. Next review {date}.
A denial is one of the few documents that is never filed silently. The attorney is told the day it lands, before anything else is done with it, because the decisions that follow are theirs and some of them are time-sensitive.
Denial dated {date} received {date}. Attorney notified {date}.
Compare the date on the denial with the date the claim form went to the employer. Record which side of the ninety days it falls on and put the comparison on the file. This is arithmetic, not judgement — what the firm does about it is the attorney’s call.
Claim form filed {date}; denial dated {date}; {N} days. Presumption {attached / did not attach} — for the attorney.
A denial is rarely total. Record it per body part and per benefit: what is rejected, what is still admitted, and the ground the carrier gives — AOE/COE, no employment, late notice, post-termination, statute. The ground is what the later case answers, and it should be legible from the file without re-reading the letter.
Denied: {body parts / benefits}. Ground stated: {ground}. Still admitted: {anything}.
A benefit notice has to say what it decides, why, and what the worker can do about it. Note anything missing — no date, no ground, no appeal language, no claim number, the wrong worker. Do not argue with it; record the defect so the attorney can decide whether it matters.
Notice defects noted: {list, or none}.
The client is told what the letter says and what happens next, in plain language. Not an opinion on the merits, not a prediction — the fact of the denial and that the firm is handling it. This call is the one the client will remember.
Client advised of the denial {date}, by {call / letter}.
A denied claim is a disputed claim, and the dispute is decided at the Board. The Application commences proceedings and satisfies the one-year statute. The firm’s practice on when to file it is the attorney’s to set — this page records that it must be filed, not when.
Application filed {date}, ADJ {number}.
A denial does not stop treatment; it stops the carrier paying for it under the claim. Confirm what the client is receiving and where, and put lien letters out to the providers who are treating. Record which providers are on notice.
Lien letters sent to {providers} {date}.
The denial names a ground; the ground names what has to be proved. Records, a panel request, the employer’s own documents — the shape depends on the ground and it is the attorney’s to direct. What the file must show is that it was directed, and when.
Proof plan noted {date}: {what was directed}.
Behind Tab 1, named as a delay. The distinction from a denial is the whole point of this page: a denial is a decision the firm answers, a delay is an absence of one the firm waits out. Filing it under the wrong word turns the second into the first.
Delay notice dated {date} received {date}. No decision made; the claim remains undecided.
Read the date the carrier gives itself and clip a follow-up on it. If the letter gives no date, say so on the file and set one — a delay with no end named by anybody is the one that runs longest.
Delay promises a decision by {date}; follow-up clipped. {Or: no date stated — follow-up set at {date}.}
Work out how much of the ninety days is left from the claim form. The delay does not extend it. If the promised decision falls after the ninety days expire, that is worth the attorney knowing now rather than then.
Claim form filed {date}; {N} days of the ninety remain as at {date}. Promised decision {date} falls {inside / outside} the period.
A delay letter names what it lacks — a recorded statement, records, an investigation, a panel. Record it, because it is the list the firm can shorten. A delay waiting on something the firm can send is a delay the firm can end.
Carrier is waiting on: {what}. {Items the firm can supply: …}
Where the carrier is waiting on something the firm holds — an authorisation, a report, a wage record — send it and record that it went. Where it is waiting on the client, arrange it. This is the one task on this page that changes the outcome rather than watching it.
{What} sent to the carrier {date}. Outstanding: {what remains}.
Clients read a delay as a refusal. Tell them plainly that no decision has been made, what the carrier says it is waiting for, and that the firm is handling it. Nothing about the merits and nothing about what the case is worth.
Client advised of the delay {date}. Explained no decision has been made.
When the date passes with nothing, that silence is the event. Tell the attorney and record that the promised date came and went — a carrier that delays past its own date and past the ninety days has made a decision by not making one.
Promised decision date {date} passed with no determination. Attorney told {date}.
Not the case manager. The manual says so in terms — a task at ninety days, set to the attorney — because a substantive right coming into existence is not a diary note. The task fires on the DATE, not on a letter arriving: the whole point is that nothing arrived. Where the injury is one of the presumptive ones under LC 3212–3213.2 the period was seventy-five days and this fired a fortnight ago; whether it is one of them is the attorney’s call, not the clerk’s.
Ninety days ran {date} from the claim form filed {date}. No acceptance, denial or determination received. Escalated to the attorney {date}. {Ordinary 90 / presumptive 75 per LC 3212–3213.2}.
A right that exists and is written nowhere is indistinguishable from one that does not. The file states the arithmetic — the filing date, the ninetieth day, and that nothing was received — and states no conclusion about what follows. The determination is the attorney’s and the Board’s; the record is the firm’s.
Claim form filed {date}; ninety days ran {date}; nothing received. Recorded {date}. No determination made by the firm.
Diaries, letters and clips written while the claim was undecided assume it still is. Review what is outstanding and what the client was last told — a client told the claim is 'pending’ after the period has run is being told something the file no longer supports. What changes is the firm’s own paper, not a position taken against the carrier.
File reviewed {date}: {N} clips and letters written on an undecided claim, {updated / left with a reason}. Client last told {date}.
A late acceptance does not undo a presumption that has already attached, and neither does a late denial — the manual says both. So a letter arriving on day ninety-five is filed, its date recorded against the ninetieth day, and the attorney told. What the file must not do is quietly re-date the statute record to the letter and let the earlier fact disappear.
Decision dated {date} received {date}, {N} days after the period ran. Filed and compared to the ninetieth day {date}. Attorney told {date}.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The case opensthe other side begins writing to the firm
Correspondence from the carrier, defence counsel or a third-party administrator
4 unless the letter is about one of these: to the judge → 2; to, from or about the evaluator → 6; a rating letter → 7; a payment, EOB or bill → 11; written discovery → 12; a records request → 13; an MSA → 14; a lien claimant → 15; intake, fee or address → cover
Written discovery arrivesit is a written discovery request
The treating doctor decides somethingit objects to a treating physician’s report
A panel is assignedit concerns the panel, a strike or an evaluator
Records are subpoenaedit demands records or answers a subpoena
A deposition is noticedit notices or reschedules a deposition
The case endsit makes or answers an offer
Money movesit concerns a payment, a rate or a benefit
A letter is not an objection because it disagrees, and it IS an objection when it says so however politely. Which it is decides whether a statutory clock has started, and that reading belongs to the attorney — the file records what the letter says and the date it was served, not a conclusion about it.
Most defence mail says something and starts nothing. Some of it carries a period on its face or triggers one by what it asks for, and the two are indistinguishable in the envelope — a demand to settle and an MPN notice arrive on the same letterhead in the same week. Reading it is the work.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain routes work to others and had no owner on any step — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
Mail, fax, e-mail, e-service or a portal. How it arrived can decide a period — five days for mail, none for personal service — and it is read off the envelope or the header, not assumed.
Letter from {who} dated {date}, received {date} by {mail / fax / e-mail / e-service}.
Not what it is headed. A letter titled a status enquiry can contain an objection, and a letter titled an objection can ask for nothing at all. What it ASKS decides where it goes.
Reads as: {objection / demand / discovery / notice / nothing asked}.
A date on a letter is not a statutory period, and the file must not make it look like one. Clip it, and record that it came from the letter rather than from a statute.
Clipped {date}, from the letter itself. Not a statutory period.
An objection to a treating report goes to that chain; a records demand to the subpoena chain; an offer to settlement. Correspondence is what is left after those questions, not the first place a letter is put.
Routed to {chain} because {reason}.
Whether the letter IS an objection, and whether a statutory clock has started, is the attorney’s reading. The file records what the letter says and when it was served, and states no view about it.
Attorney told {date}: letter names {period / no period}.
Whether a letter IS an objection decides whether a statutory clock has started. Politeness is not the test and the heading is not the test. The answer goes on the file in one word, because everything downstream reads it rather than re-reading the letter.
Read as {an objection / not an objection} {date}. Clock {started {date} / not started}.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
A letter arrives from the other sideit objects to a treating physician’s report
The carrier answers the claimaccepted — treatment proceeds
A report that changes what the worker gets — P&S, work status, a treatment the carrier will refuse
PR2 → 5; PR3, PR4 (a P&S report) → 7
The case opens at the Boarda filed case does not stop treatment
The case is set for hearingthe doctor goes on reporting after the case is set
The case endstreatment continues until the settlement is approved
Treatment is refusedthe treating doctor requests authorization
A provider claims against the casea provider treated and can claim against the case
A panel is assigneda party objects to the treating doctor’s finding
Work is offeredthe doctor releases to modified or regular work
20 days if represented, 30 if not
from receipt of the report
LC 4062(a)
20 days represented ordinarily · 30 days unrepresented as the exception. Twenty days where the employee is represented, thirty where they are not. The badge shows twenty because a represented file is this firm’s ordinary case and the shorter period.
TWENTY days, not thirty. The thirty-day figure everyone carries is the QME report window under 8 CCR 31.5(a) — a different document by a doctor who may be the same person. The form number decides it: a PR-4 is med-legal, a PR-2 is not.
Behind Tab 5, named for the provider and its own date. Most treating reports need nothing else, and adding a notification to each of them is how the ones that matter get missed.
{Report type} from {provider} dated {date}, filed.
Permanent and stationary, a change in work status, a new body part, a treatment the carrier is likely to refuse. Any of those and the attorney is told; none of them and it is filed and left.
Report {is / is not} a determination: {what it decides}.
With the objection window computed from receipt. Twenty days on a represented case.
Determination told to the attorney {date}; objection window to {date}.
A body part treated but never pleaded is a gap in the Application, and this is where it first becomes visible.
New body part {part} appears in treatment {date}. {Pleaded / not pleaded}.
Who is treating, for what, and how recently. It is the answer to the question the client asks most often and the one the attorney needs before any conference.
Treating: {providers}, most recent {date}.
The mechanism described, the body parts, the doctor’s view on whether it arose at work. This is the earliest medical account and everything later is compared with it.
First report by {provider} dated {date}: {mechanism}, {body parts}, causation {stated view}.
Against the Application and the intake account. Where the body parts or the mechanism differ, that is a fact the attorney needs before the defence finds it.
First report {consistent with / differs from} the claim: {detail}.
A part appearing here but not in the Application is a gap, and this is the earliest point it can be seen.
Body parts in the first report not pleaded: {list, or none}.
Off work, modified, full duty — with the date. It is often the start of the temporary disability question.
Work status from {date}: {status}.
Objection to a Treating Physician’s Determination
signed by attorney
goes to defence, served
starts the panel process — the request for a panel follows the objection
LC 4062(a), 4062.2
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The treating doctor decides somethingthe treating doctor requests authorization
The carrier defers the reviewliability resolves and review resumes
A utilization review decision refusing a treatment
The case opens at the Boardauthorisation disputes run while the case is litigated
The carrier defers the reviewthe carrier defers instead of deciding
A panel is assignedthe dispute is not medical necessity
30 days — 10 for a formulary dispute
from service of the UR decision on the employee
LC 4610.5(f), (h)(1)–(3); 8 CCR 9792.10.1
30 days ordinarily · 10 days for a formulary dispute as the exception. Thirty days is the ordinary period. Ten applies to a formulary dispute only. The badge shows ten because it is the shorter and the one missed.
does not run when the descriptor is a Deferral or a Delay — they decide no medical necessity, so nothing attaches
15 days — 12 if the notice was sent electronically, 10 for a formulary drug, 24 HOURS on an expedited review
from the NOA
8 CCR 9792.10.5
Denial, modification, deferral, delay or approval — before anything else, because it decides whether there is a clock at all. Write which it is on the file in that word. Everything downstream reads it rather than re-reading the letter.
UR decision dated {date}: {denial / modification / deferral / delay / approval}. {Clock runs / no clock}.
The clock runs from service on the employee. Take it off the document — the proof of service, the cover, the fax header if that is all there is — and record which one was used. Where the document does not say, that is a question, not an assumption.
Service date {date}, taken from {where}. IMR window closes {date}.
Thirty days from service on the employee, or TEN where the dispute is over the formulary — and which it is comes off the denial, not from habit. The closing date is computed on the task above; this one puts it in the diary with a name against it, because a date in a memo is a date nobody owns.
IMR window {30 / 10} days from {date}, closes {date}. Assigned to {who}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 8. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
Every denial and every modification, the day it arrives. Not because the attorney does the appeal, but because a denied treatment is a fact about the case they need before somebody asks them about it.
Attorney told {date}.
The treatment at issue, the determination, the dates, and the firm’s current address. A stale address is corrected on the document. A letter missing what IMR requires stops the packet — say so rather than sending an incomplete one.
Letter checked {date}. {Complete / missing: …}. Address {current / corrected}.
One PDF, in this order: the served Application for IMR completed and signed; the UR letter; the client’s authorization and representative designation; the demographics sheet on a first denial only; then the supporting reports. One attachment, never several — that is the review organization’s submission requirement, not a preference.
IMR packet assembled {date}: {N} pages, {components}.
The packet is sent under a person’s approval. The signature on the application is the client’s or the representative’s, and who signs is settled before the packet is built, not after.
Packet approved by {who} {date}.
To the Administrative Director with a copy of the decision attached, and a copy to the claims administrator. The sent packet is filed at Tab 9 beside the denial it answers.
IMR application sent {date} to the AD; copy to the administrator. Filed Tab 9.
What comes back lands on Tab 9. The Notice of Assignment opens a short window for supporting records; a Request for Information carries its own date; the determination is routed, never re-appealed here.
NOA {received {date} / not received as at {date}}.
IMR Application Packet
signed by client or representative
goes to the Administrative Director, copy to the claims administrator
starts assignment by the review organization, then the supporting-records window
8 CCR 9792.10.1, 9792.10.5
ONE PDF, in that order — a submission requirement of the review organization, not a preference. The demographics sheet goes on a first denial only. Never a blank IMR form: use the copy served with the decision.
One PDF, in this order — one attachment, never several. That is the review organisation’s submission requirement, not a filing preference.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
Treatment is refusedthe carrier defers instead of deciding
A UR decision whose descriptor is Deferral or Delay
Treatment is refusedliability resolves and review resumes
no clock
from —
LC 4610(l), (m)
This is the one that produces a confident wrong deadline. A deferral or delay looks like a denial and is not: nothing attaches and no appeal window runs. Clipping it as a denial creates a real, cited, diarised deadline for an appeal that does not exist.
LC 4610.6(h) — the thirty days to seek review of an IMR determination at the Board — is not in AAI-STD 1, so it has not been through the standard’s verification against primary text. It is NOT the same section as the appeal to IMR (LC 4610.5(h)(1)); both are thirty days about the same treatment, which is exactly why the section number is worth confirming before anyone relies on it.
Assignment, request, determination. They arrive from the same sender about the same dispute and they are not interchangeable — one opens a window, one asks a question, one ends the matter.
{Document} dated {date} received {date}, filed Tab 9 beside the application.
Read whether the notice went electronically, whether this is a formulary dispute, whether the review is expedited. Then clip fifteen, twelve, ten days or twenty-four hours accordingly, and write on the file which branch was used.
NOA dated {date}; {electronic / formulary / expedited / ordinary}; supporting records due {date}.
The reports that support the treatment — the same ones that went in the packet, plus anything since. The window is the employee’s and the administrator’s alike; nothing waits for their submission.
Supporting records sent {date}: {what}.
Read what is being asked, get it, and send it. An unanswered request is decided without the answer.
RFI dated {date} asking {what}; answered {date}.
Overturned, upheld, or partial — and a partial is per treatment, not per letter. Record the outcome for each item requested, because a determination that overturns one thing and upholds another is two results in one envelope.
Determination dated {date}: {item} {overturned / upheld} · {item} {overturned / upheld}.
An overturn goes to the attorney — the treatment is authorised and someone has to make it happen. An uphold goes to the case manager, unless the treatment was surgery, homecare or a device, in which case it goes to the attorney too. The stakes decide the routing, not the outcome alone.
Routed to {attorney / case manager} because {overturn / uphold on {surgery|homecare|device} / uphold}.
An overturned denial means the treatment is authorised. Tell the treating physician and the client, and record that it went — an authorisation nobody acts on is the same as a denial to the person waiting for it.
Overturn communicated to {provider} and client {date}.
The determination is not re-appealed to IMR. The only route is review at the Board within thirty days on narrow grounds. Give the attorney the date and the document; whether any ground exists is theirs.
Uphold dated {date}; window to {date} per LC 4610.6(h). For the attorney.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
A letter arrives from the other sideit concerns the panel, a strike or an evaluator
The treating doctor decides somethinga party objects to the treating doctor’s finding
Treatment is refusedthe dispute is not medical necessity
No appointment can be hada replacement panel is requested
The administrative director assigns three evaluators
a report → 7; anything else → 6
A deposition is noticeddiscovery and the evaluation proceed together
No appointment can be hadno appointment inside the statutory window
Records go to the evaluatorthe panel is assigned and records go out
10 days, +5 when served by mail
from assignment of the panel by the administrative director
LC 4062.2(c)
10 days ordinarily · 15 when the panel was served by mail as the exception. Ten days from assignment, plus five when the panel was served by mail. The badge shows ten; how it was served is read off the document, not assumed.
10 BUSINESS days
from the date the evaluator is selected from the panel
8 CCR 31.3(d)
By mail or otherwise, and on what date the administrative director assigned it. Both go on the file before the strike date is computed, because both are inputs to it. This is the one task on the page that is pure clerical work and changes a deadline by five days.
Panel assigned {date}, received {date}, served by {mail / other}. Strike due {date}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 6. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
The strike is the attorney’s choice and the window is ten days. Nothing about a panel waits.
Panel of {names} told to attorney {date}.
Names, specialties, locations. Whatever the firm knows about each. The choice is the attorney’s and it is made once — the file’s job is to make it an informed one rather than a hurried one.
Panel detail assembled {date}.
A served letter is the practice; no rule prescribes a form. Serve it and file the proof — a strike nobody can prove was served is a strike that may not have happened.
Strike served {date} on {parties}; POS filed. Evaluator remaining: {name}.
Business days. If the firm does not schedule, the claims administrator may — and then the appointment is theirs to arrange rather than ours.
Appointment with {evaluator} set for {date}, arranged {date}.
The appointment is a calendar entry and it must belong to a person. An event with no assignee is owned by nobody and appears on nobody’s calendar.
Appointment {date} calendared to {who}.
Tell the client where and when, arrange an interpreter if one is needed, and transport if that is the firm’s practice. An evaluation the client cannot get to is an evaluation that has to be scheduled again.
Client notified {date}; interpreter {arranged / not needed}; transport {arranged / not needed}.
Decide when the records go to the evaluator, then work backwards. Serve the other side twenty days before that date and hold the records until it passes. Anything to an AME needs the parties’ agreement.
Records served on {parties} {date}; earliest send to evaluator {date}.
Their proposed records arrive with a ten-day objection window, and an objection not made at the first opportunity is taken as agreement. Read them and put the question to the attorney with days still on the clock.
Their records served {date}; objection window to {date}; {objected {date} / no objection}.
QME Panel Strike
signed by attorney
goes to defence, served
LC 4062.2(c)
No rule prescribes the form — a served letter is the practice. Ten days from assignment, plus five by mail.
the attorney picks the date; late here is a decision, not an accident
A panel is assignedno appointment inside the statutory window
The evaluator has no appointment within ninety days
a report → 7; anything else → 6
A panel is assigneda replacement panel is requested
90 days — a party may waive to accept one within 120
from the party’s request for an appointment
8 CCR 31.3(e)–(f), 31.5(a)(2) · Vazquez (WCAB en banc, 2025)
90 days ordinarily · 120 if a party waives to accept a later date as the exception. Ninety days from the request for an appointment. A party may waive to accept one within a hundred and twenty — a choice, not an extension, and one the attorney makes.
Waiting is a decision. At ninety days the firm may waive to accept a later date; past a hundred and twenty either party may report it. Whether to replace for good cause is the Board\u2019s call, weighed on delay, prejudice, efforts to cure and case-specific reasons — not automatic.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain has a date somebody must act on and named nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
Ninety days runs from the REQUEST, not from the panel or the strike. It is the one date this chain turns on and the one most easily lost, because nothing arrives to mark it.
Appointment requested {date} from {evaluator}. Ninety days to {date}.
Two dates, not one. At ninety the firm may waive to accept a later appointment; past a hundred and twenty either party may report it. Both go on the file when the request goes out.
Ninety days to {date}; hundred and twenty to {date}. Both diarised.
Waiting is a decision and it is the attorney’s. Accept a later date, or seek a replacement panel — and whether a replacement is granted is the Board’s, weighed on delay and prejudice, not automatic.
Choice put to the attorney {date}: {waive / replacement panel / wait}.
Three choices and no default. Waiting is one of them and is recorded as a decision, not left as what happened because nobody chose.
At ninety days: {wait / waive to a later date / replacement panel} {date}.
Reporting is a step, not an outcome. It records that the appointment could not be had; what follows is the Board’s.
Unavailability reported {date} to {who}.
the same exchange whichever side began it, and both are on a clock
A panel is assignedthe panel is assigned and records go out
either side proposes records for the evaluator
5 (returned on a subpoena → 13)
The evaluator reportsthe evaluation happens
20 days BEFORE — the only clock that counts backwards
from the date the firm proposes to send them
LC 4062.3(a)–(g); 8 CCR 35(d) · Maxham (en banc, 2017); Suon (en banc, 2018)
Counts BACKWARDS. Nothing reaches the evaluator until the twenty days have run from service on every other party.
Serve the proposed records. The other side has TEN days to object to anything in them; that period runs inside ours. Nothing reaches the evaluator until the TWENTY days are up — the objection window closing early does not release the records.
“Information” served on an evaluator is not only records — it is anything communicated to them. A letter to the evaluator is information and is served on every other party the same way the records are.Maxham v. CDCR (WCAB en banc, 2017)
A dispute about what may go to the evaluator is for the Appeals Board. Neither side resolves it by agreeing between themselves or by sending the disputed material anyway.Suon v. California Dairies (WCAB en banc, 2018)
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain routes work to others and had no owner on any step — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
This clock runs BACKWARDS. The service date is twenty days before the records may go, so the send date is chosen first and the service date is computed from it — not the other way round.
Records to go {date}; served on all parties by {date}, twenty days before.
From tabs 5, 7 and 13. Anything added after service must be served again and restarts the twenty days, so the set is settled before it goes out.
Proposed records assembled {date}: {list}, {N} pages.
Every party, not only the defence. The proof of service carries the date the twenty days run from, which makes it the most consequential document on this chain.
Proposed records served {date} on {parties}; POS filed.
Their ten days to object runs inside our twenty. An objection to what they propose is ours to make in the same window, and it is the attorney’s call.
Their proposed records received {date}; objection window to {date}. Attorney told.
Their proposed records are a med-legal SCHEDULING document, not records the firm holds — tab 6, not tab 5. The standard names this as the one case that is expressly not a question for a person to decide: it is filed to tab 6, the ten days are clipped, and the attorney is told. All three, or the ten days run against a document nobody can find.
Their proposed records served {date}, filed tab 6. Ten days close {date}.
Their ten days runs inside our twenty. An objection to what the other side proposes to send is made in that window or not at all, and a dispute about what may go to the evaluator is for the Board rather than the parties.
Their proposed records {objected to / accepted} {date}. Reason: {…}.
The objection window closing early does not release the records. The evaluator receives ONE document, and it goes on the date computed at the start, not sooner.
Records sent to the evaluator {date}. Twenty days ran from {date}.
Records Set for the Evaluator
signed by attorney
goes to the evaluator, served on every party twenty days before
starts the other side’s 10 days to object; nothing goes to the evaluator before the 20 days run
LC 4062.3(b), (e); 8 CCR 35(d)
The evaluator receives ONE document. Anything to an AME needs the parties’ agreement.
The evaluator receives ONE document. Nothing reaches them until the twenty days run, and anything added after service must be served too.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
Records go to the evaluatorthe evaluation happens
The report the case turns on
a report → 7; anything else → 6
The case is set for hearingthe reporting supports setting the case
The case endsthe report supports a settlement value
30 days, +15 for good cause
from the examination, or when the evaluation procedure began
LC 139.2(j)(1), 4062.5 · Vazquez (WCAB en banc, 2025)
30 days ordinarily · 45 with good cause as the exception. Thirty days, extendable by fifteen for good cause. The extension is not automatic and is not assumed; the badge shows the period as it stands.
Always, without a condition. This is the report the case is valued from and the attorney reads it themselves — the file does not summarise it for them.
Report by {evaluator} dated {date}, exam {date}, served {date}. Attorney told {date}.
Examination, report, service. Each is a different clock: the exam date is what the thirty days ran from, the report date is what it produced, the service date is what any objection runs from. A file that holds one of them holds none of the answers.
Exam {date}; report {date}; served {date}. Report was {N} days after the exam.
Under its OWN date, at tab 7. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
Thirty days from the exam, plus fifteen if good cause was claimed. Work out the gap and put it on the file. A late report is a statutory ground to replace the evaluator — whether the firm wants that is entirely the attorney’s question.
Exam to report: {N} days. {Within / beyond} the period. For the attorney.
Whole-person impairment per body part, apportionment per body part, the maximum-medical-improvement status and date, work restrictions, and the page each was found on. What the report concludes about a percentage is recorded as what the report says — never adopted as the file’s own figure.
Findings recorded from {report}: {parts and WPI}, apportionment {…}, MMI {status/date}.
Compare the body parts evaluated against the body parts pleaded and the body parts treated. A part that was treated but not evaluated, or pleaded but not addressed, is a gap — and it is far cheaper to notice now than after the conference.
Evaluated: {parts}. Pleaded but not addressed: {parts}. Treated but not evaluated: {parts}.
Whether to object, ask for a supplemental, or accept it. There is no statutory clock, which is precisely why it needs a date — an open question with no deadline is the one that reaches the conference unanswered.
Objection question put to the attorney {date}; their date {date}.
Whether the report is objectionable, and on what. A decision not to object is recorded — the report stands as evidence either way, and the file must show that was a choice.
Objection to the {date} report {made / not made} {date}. Reason: {…}.
A supplemental request, a deposition of the evaluator, further records — each gets a date that falls before the conference, not on it. The conference is the wall; everything is scheduled to land before it.
{What} clipped for {date}, ahead of the conference on {date}.
The report has been received and the attorney is reviewing it. Not what it says about their percentage, not what the case is now worth — those are the attorney’s to discuss and premature from anyone else.
Client advised the report was received {date}.
our filing, on a clock nobody chose — miss it and the claim is barred
The injured worker diesthe dependants file their own application
The carrier answers the claimdenied, delayed, or benefits are disputed
The injury gets worsea petition to reopen restarts the case
The attorney directs the filing
The treating doctor decides somethinga filed case does not stop treatment
Treatment is refusedauthorisation disputes run while the case is litigated
The case is set for hearingthe case is ready to be heard
A petition for serious and willful misconductthe facts support serious and willful misconduct
The prior disability is at issuea prior permanent disability is in play
A deposition is noticedthe defense wants the applicant’s testimony
Records are subpoenaedrecords are needed from a third party
one year
from the date of injury, the end of the last indemnity period, or the last medical furnished — whichever is latest
LC 5405
Already runningThis period did not start when this chain did. It has been running since the date of injury — before the case reached this page, and in most files before the firm was retained. What is left is what matters, and the answer is on the file, not on this page.
On a CUMULATIVE TRAUMA this phrase names two dates. The injury has a period start and a period end, and anything computed from the date of injury uses the END date. Both dates go on the file; neither is used silently.
no period — the responsible entity "must be divulged at the earliest opportunity, and certainly no later than the commencement of the litigation process and formal proceedings" (Coldiron I)
from the commencement of the case
Coldiron I & II (WCAB en banc, 2002) · DiFusco (WCAB en banc, 2025) · 8 CCR 10390, 10400, 10401 · CCP 2017.210
Filed after the period, the claim is barred and no diligence afterwards recovers it. The period is not extended by the carrier’s delay in answering.
THREE candidate dates, and the latest governs: the date of injury, the end of the last indemnity period, or the last medical treatment furnished. A file that looks a year stale under one of them may be current under another, and the usual error is computing from the date of injury alone because that is the date everybody knows.
Pleadings are read for substance, not form. A technical defect in a filing is not a reason to treat it as a nullity — which matters most here, where the filing is what keeps the claim alive.Perez v. Chicago Dogs (WCAB en banc, 2025)
CCP 2017.210 is not in AAI-STD 1. It is quoted in DiFusco (WCAB en banc, 2025) as the discovery route to insurance information, and the disclosure duty itself rests on Coldiron I & II (WCAB en banc, 2002), which DiFusco Holding No. 3 reaffirms. Binding precedent, from a corpus the published standard does not carry.
Whether and when to file is the attorney’s decision, not a step that follows automatically from a denial. What this page records is that the decision is made deliberately and that the file shows who made it.
Attorney directed the Application be filed {date}.
The Application states the worker, the employer, the insurer, the date of injury, the body parts and the venue. Each is checked against a record rather than against the intake questionnaire — the questionnaire is the client’s account, and the Application is a pleading. A wrong employer or a wrong date of injury on a filed Application is corrected by amending it, which is a filing of its own.
Application fields verified against {sources} {date}.
Prepare it on the Board’s own form. Body parts are pleaded as they are alleged, with laterality; the venue follows the rule for the case, not convenience.
Application drafted {date} for attorney review.
A pleading is signed by the attorney. Nobody signs it on their behalf, and the file records who signed and when.
Application signed by {attorney} {date}.
Filed with the Board, then served on every party with a proof of service. The proof of service is a sworn statement in the first person — it carries the name of whoever actually served it, never someone else’s.
Application filed {date}; served on {parties} {date}; POS filed.
The reason this task exists as its own line is that it is the one most often missed. The Application is filed, the case moves on, and a satisfied one-year clock sits open on the file for years afterward looking like a live deadline.
LC 5405 satisfied by the filing of {date}. Clock closed against that date.
The Board returns a conformed copy with the ADJ number. That number is the case’s identity at the Board and it goes on the case record — not only inside the PDF, where nothing can search it.
ADJ {number} assigned; conformed copy filed {date}; case record updated.
A follow-up so that silence is noticed. There is no clock the firm holds against a defence that does not answer, but the fact of it belongs on the file.
Answer {received {date} / not received as at {date}}.
A watch was set when the Application was filed. It has been answered; close it against the date rather than leaving it to expire.
Answer received {date}. Follow-up closed.
Injury arising out of employment, the employment relationship, the body parts, apportionment, the statute of limitations, post-termination. What is denied is what has to be proved, and it should be legible from the file without re-reading the pleading.
Defences raised: {list}.
Not the document — the list. An answer that denies employment is a different case from one that admits it and disputes apportionment.
Attorney told {date}: {summary of what is in issue}.
Whom the answer is filed for, and whether that matches the carrier and employer on the file. A discrepancy here is worth resolving before anything is served.
Answer filed for {parties}; {consistent / discrepancy: …}.
Application for Adjudication of Claim
signed by attorney
goes to the Board, then served on every party
starts proceedings are commenced — the one-year statute is satisfied
LC 5405
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
A letter arrives from the other sideit is a written discovery request
Interrogatories, requests for admission or requests for production, served by a party
Records are subpoenaedanswering it needs records from a third party
The case is set for hearingdiscovery closes at the conference
The response date comes from the request itself. Where the request names none, the attorney sets one rather than the file assuming a period — and a request that names an impossible date is answered by saying so, not by treating it as void.
The period is on the document, not in a statute. That is why it is easy to miss: a deposition notice announces itself and a set of interrogatories looks like more mail. The date the request carries is the date the file clips.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain has a date somebody must act on and named nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
How it arrived can change what is left of the period, and a written discovery request is easy to mistake for ordinary mail.
Discovery request from {who}, dated {date}, served {date} by {method}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 12. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
It is printed on the request. This is the one period on the map that is in no statute, which is exactly why it must be read off the document rather than assumed from a rule.
Response date on the request: {date}. Source: the request itself.
Whether the request is answerable, objectionable or impossible on its own date is the attorney’s. The file records the date and who was told.
Attorney told {date}; response date {date}.
A clip that does not say where its date came from cannot be checked later. Where the request names no date, the attorney sets one and the file records that it was set rather than found.
Clipped {date}, {from the request / set by the attorney}.
Which requests are answered, which are objected to, and on what ground. A request that names an impossible date is answered by saying so rather than treated as void.
Response directed {date}: {answer / object} per request. Grounds: {…}.
What the request asks for, from the file. Where answering needs records the firm does not hold, that is a subpoena and a different chain.
Assembled for the response {date}: {what}. Outstanding: {what}.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
A letter arrives from the other sideit notices or reschedules a deposition
The case opens at the Boardthe defense wants the applicant’s testimony
Notice that a party is to be deposed
A panel is assigneddiscovery and the evaluation proceed together
The case is set for hearingdiscovery closes
the noticed date — at least 10 days after service, or 20 after issuance of the subpoena where consumer or employment records are subpoenaed
from service of the notice
LC 5710(a)–(b); CCP 2025.270(a), (c)
A FLOOR. The noticed date must be at least ten days after service — twenty where consumer or employment records were subpoenaed for it. A notice giving less is answered, not accommodated.
A notice giving less than ten days is answered, not accommodated. Twenty if records were subpoenaed for it. And the applicant is OWED transportation, lost wages, one transcript, a fee and a certified interpreter — claimed as a matter of course, not when someone remembers.
At least ten days after service; twenty after issuance where records were subpoenaed for it. Work it out and record it — a short notice is answered, not accommodated.
Notice served {date} for {date}: {N} days. {Sufficient / short — attorney told}.
Whether to object, seek a different date, or accept it. And whether the attorney is available, which is not a detail.
Deposition notice told to the attorney {date}.
It is a date somebody has to attend. An event owned by nobody appears on nobody’s calendar.
Deposition {date} calendared to {who}.
Tell them when and where, arrange an interpreter if one is needed, arrange transport. Confirm the day before — a deposition the client does not attend is rescheduled at cost.
Client confirmed {date}; interpreter {arranged / not needed}; transport {arranged / not needed}.
The attorney’s work, and the file records that it happened.
Client prepared by {attorney} {date}.
Transportation, lost wages, meals and the interpreter are known on the day and are claimed now — waiting on the transcript to claim any of it is how a claim goes stale. The TRANSCRIPT cost is not known yet; it is claimed when the transcript arrives, and the file says which items are outstanding.
LC 5710 costs claimed {date}: {transportation, wages, interpreter, meals}. Transcript cost outstanding.
It goes behind Tab 12 with its own date. And it carries the last LC 5710 item: the transcript cost, which could not be claimed when the rest was.
Transcript received {date}, filed. Transcript cost claimed {date}.
the attorney picks the date; late here is a decision, not an accident
Written discovery arrivesanswering it needs records from a third party
A letter arrives from the other sideit demands records or answers a subpoena
The case opens at the Boardrecords are needed from a third party
The attorney directs a subpoena to a custodian
Medical records come inthe custodian produces
no earlier than 20 days after issuance or 15 after service — WHICHEVER IS LATER
from issuance and service of the subpoena
LC 130, 5710; CCP 2020.410(c); Evid. Code 1560(b)(2)
A FLOOR, not a deadline. Twenty days from ISSUANCE or fifteen from SERVICE, WHICHEVER IS LATER — so the governing date is the later of the two, and the badge shows the shorter branch only as a reminder that neither alone is the answer. Served sooner, the subpoena is defective rather than early.
10 days
from service of their proposed records or information
LC 4062.3(b); 8 CCR 35(d) · Suon (2018)
Twenty days from ISSUANCE or fifteen from SERVICE — whichever is LATER. Using one of the two produces a date that is too early, which is a defective subpoena rather than an aggressive one.
The custodian, the records, the date range. A subpoena that asks for everything from everybody returns a packet nobody can use and costs the same as a precise one.
SDT to {custodian} for {records}, {date range}.
Twenty days from issuance, fifteen from service, and take the later. Record both computations so the date on the document can be checked rather than trusted.
Issued {date} +20 = {date}; served {date} +15 = {date}. Production date {the later}.
On the custodian and on every party. The proof of service is sworn in the first person by whoever served it.
SDT served {date} on {custodian} and {parties}; POS filed.
A records request that nobody is tracking is a records request that arrives after the conference or not at all. The log is what makes chasing possible.
Added to the records log {date}; due {date}.
Not a week later. A custodian that has not produced is either not going to or has not received it, and both are worth knowing early.
Follow-up {date}: {response}.
A subpoena return is several documents in one envelope — a cover letter, the custodian’s declaration, the subpoena, the records themselves. Each is filed as its own thing, because each is findable only under its own name.
Return received {date}: {N} pages, split into {components}.
The declaration signed, the pages continuous, the date range covered. Gaps in the numbering and an unsigned declaration are both worth raising before the records are relied on.
Return checked: declaration {signed / unsigned}; pages {continuous / gaps at …}; range {covered / short}.
Subpoena Duces Tecum
signed by attorney
goes to the custodian, served on every party
starts the custodian’s production
CCP 2020.410(c); Evid. Code 1560(b)(2)
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
Records are subpoenaedthe custodian produces
Reports, records and provider paper
5 (returned on a subpoena → 13)
The treating doctor decides somethinga report decides something the worker’s benefits turn on
20 days if represented, 30 if not
from receipt of the report
LC 4062(a)
20 days represented ordinarily · 30 days unrepresented as the exception. Twenty days where the employee is represented, thirty where they are not. The badge shows twenty because a represented file is this firm’s ordinary case and the shorter period.
Most treating reports need nothing. The judgement is spotting the one that changes what the worker gets — that one starts a twenty-day clock and belongs on the defensive chain.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain names a period in its own prose and owned nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
The twenty days run from receipt. A report dated three weeks before it arrives has not been sitting on a running clock, and a report that arrived before it was date-stamped has. Receipt is the date the period is computed from and it exists nowhere but on the stamp.
Report of {date} from {provider} received {date} by {method}.
Tab 5 by default; tab 13 where it came back on a subpoena, because how it arrived is what a later reader needs to know about it.
Filed tab {5 / 13} under {date}.
Most reports continue treatment and need nothing. A report that changes work restrictions, states maximum medical improvement, apportions, or releases the worker DECIDES something — and that one starts twenty days to object. Spotting it is the whole job of this chain; the reading of what follows is the attorney’s.
Report of {date}: {continues treatment / decides {what}}.
Twenty days from RECEIPT, not from the report’s own date, and only where the report decides something — most do not. A report that decides nothing is filed and needs no clip; clipping every report buries the one that matters.
Report of {date} received {date}; objection window closes {date}. Assigned to {who}.
With the receipt date, because that is what the twenty days count from. The file records the date it went and no view on whether an objection lies.
Attorney told {date}; report received {date}; twenty days to {date}.
Twenty days from receipt where the worker is represented. A decision not to object is recorded with its date and its reason — the report stands as evidence either way, and the file must show that was a choice rather than a period that ran out.
Objection to the {date} report {made / not made} {date}. Reason: {…}.
A body part treated but never pleaded is a gap in the Application. This is where it first becomes visible, and it is visible nowhere else — the pleading is not re-read every time a report arrives.
Body parts in the {date} report: {list}. Pleaded: {list}. Gap: {what}.
Providers, dates of service, findings. Assembling this at the point a demand is made means assembling it from a file nobody indexed, months later.
Treatment list current to {date}.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The treating doctor decides somethingthe doctor releases to modified or regular work
An offer of regular, modified or alternative work
1, 10, 11 — the claim itself (acceptance, denial, delay) → 1; a rate, an offer or a voucher → 10; a check → 11
The case endsthe voucher and return-to-work bear on value
depends on the DATE OF INJURY
from the offer — the employer’s window is 60 days
LC 4658(d)(2)–(3); 4658.1(a)–(c); 4658.7(b)(1)–(2) · Dennis (WCAB en banc, 2020)
The same letter does two different things. Injuries 2005–2012: it moves permanent disability by ±15%. Injuries from 2013: it decides the SJDB voucher instead, and only an offer lasting at least twelve months counts. Read the date of injury before anything else.
Before anything else, because it decides which statute the document is read under. The same offer is a fifteen per cent adjustment on one case and a voucher question on another.
Offer dated {date}; DOI {date}; read under {LC 4658(d) / LC 4658.7}.
Every offer of work, the day it arrives, whichever rule applies.
Attorney told {date}.
Regular, modified or alternative; the duties, the wage, the hours, and — for a post-2013 injury — whether it is for at least twelve months. The twelve months is what decides the voucher and it is often not stated plainly.
Offered: {type}, {duties}, {wage}, {hours}, duration {N months}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 10. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
Against the restrictions in the most recent report. Where the offer exceeds them, that is a fact worth putting in front of the attorney rather than in front of the client.
Offer compared with restrictions of {date}: {consistent / exceeds in …}.
What is offered, what accepting or declining does. On a post-2013 injury that includes what happens to the voucher. This conversation is the attorney’s because the consequences are legal ones.
Offer discussed with the client {date}; instructions {…}.
Accepted, declined, or no response — with the date. It is the fact everything afterwards turns on.
Offer {accepted / declined / no response} {date}.
the same exchange whichever side began it, and both are on a clock
Written discovery arrivesdiscovery closes at the conference
The case opens at the Boardthe case is ready to be heard
The evaluator reportsthe reporting supports setting the case
A deposition is noticeddiscovery closes
A petition for serious and willful misconductthe petition is set for hearing
The prior disability is at issuethe Fund claim is set for hearing
A provider claims against the casethe lien is set for conference
Either side declares the case ready
The treating doctor decides somethingthe doctor goes on reporting after the case is set
The Board decidesthe matter is heard and decided
The case endsthe case resolves at the conference
the date on the notice
from the notice
—
the conference date
from the mandatory settlement conference
LC 5502(d)(3)
A decision rests on the admitted record. What was said at a conference is not evidence unless it was put in — so what the file can prove is what the file filed.Gaines v. ABM Aviation (WCAB en banc, 2026)
Everything on this page turns on it. Ours means the firm chose this; theirs means the firm is answering. Record it on the file in words, not by inference from who signed.
DOR filed by {us / the defence}, dated {date}, received {date}.
A DOR moves a case whichever side files it. The attorney is told the day it arrives, because the decisions that follow — object, agree, or use the time — are theirs and the window on the first of them is short.
Attorney told {date}.
Clip the twenty-five days from service and note the rule it comes from. Whether to object is the attorney’s call; having the date is the file’s job.
Objection window to {date} per WCAB Rule 10417, from service {date}. For the attorney.
A DOR says discovery is done. Filing one before it is done is how a case arrives at a conference without the report it needs — and the cutoff the conference brings is what makes that permanent. What is outstanding, and whether it matters, is the attorney’s judgement; the file records that the question was asked.
Attorney confirmed readiness {date}. Outstanding at filing: {items, or none}.
Records not returned, a report not received, a deposition not taken, a supplemental not answered. One list, on the file, before the conference date is known — because once it is known the list becomes a deadline.
Outstanding as at {date}: {list}.
The follow-up. If nothing has come, that is worth raising rather than waiting further — a DOR that produced no date usually means something about the filing, not about the Board.
Notice of hearing {received {date} / not received as at {date}}.
The conference date is the discovery cutoff. Clip it, and clip against it everything the outstanding list still holds — each one dated before the conference, not on it.
Conference {date}; discovery closes that day. Outstanding items clipped against it.
The date, the type, the judge and the venue. Calendared as an event with an assignee — an appearance nobody is assigned to is an appearance nobody makes.
{Hearing type} {date}, Judge {name}, {venue}. Calendared to {who}; attorney told {date}.
Records not returned, reports not received, depositions not taken, objections not answered. Against the conference date, each becomes a date rather than an intention.
Outstanding as at {date}: {list}, all against the conference of {date}.
Not on the conference date — before it, with enough time for the thing to actually arrive. A subpoena issued a fortnight out will not produce records in time and the clip should say so.
Clipped: {item} for {date}; {item} for {date}.
The attorney’s work. The file’s job is that it is scheduled rather than remembered.
Preparation task set for {date}.
Whether they need to attend, where, and when. And an interpreter if one is needed.
Client told {date}; attendance {required / not required}; interpreter {arranged / not needed}.
Continued, settled, tried, taken off calendar. The minutes arrive later and separately; this is the note that says what the file should expect.
Hearing {date}: {outcome}.
Issues, exhibits, witnesses, stipulations. What is not listed may not be usable, so the statement is built from the outstanding list rather than from memory.
PTCS prepared {date} for the conference of {date}.
What is in dispute and what is agreed. The statement is signed and it binds.
Issues settled by {attorney} {date}.
Board-issued, under their own date. They are the record of what the conference decided and they are read rather than filed blind.
Minutes of {date} received {date}: {what was decided}.
A trial date, a further conference, an order to do something by a date. Each becomes a clip.
From the minutes: {what}, clipped for {date}.
The new conference date is the new cutoff and everything scheduled against the old one moves. Leaving a clip on a superseded date is how an item quietly stops being tracked.
Conference continued from {date} to {date}; {N} clips moved.
Declaration of Readiness to Proceed
signed by attorney
goes to the Board, served on every party
starts a hearing is set by the Board; discovery closes at the MSC it sets
LC 5502(d)(3)
the attorney picks the date; late here is a decision, not an accident
The injured worker diesthe dependency claim resolves
A letter arrives from the other sideit makes or answers an offer
The evaluator reportsthe report supports a settlement value
The case is set for hearingthe case resolves at the conference
The judge wants more before approvingthe defect is cured and it is resubmitted
Work is offeredthe voucher and return-to-work bear on value
The parties agree
The treating doctor decides somethingtreatment continues until the settlement is approved
The judge wants more before approvingthe judge wants more before approving
The Board decidesthe judge approves
—
from the filing
8 CCR 10700(a) · Gaines v. ABM Aviation (WCAB en banc, 2026)
the date the order sets — where it sets none, the attorney sets a 30-day check
from service of the award or order
LC 5814
Every AME, QME and treating report bearing on adequacy. Not a selection — the rule is that they go, and withholding them or saying none exist when they do is prohibited. Build the list before the settlement is drafted, because the list is part of what makes it approvable.
Reports assembled for filing: {list}. None withheld.
What is being released, what is not, and that it is final. This is the attorney’s conversation and the file records that it happened, not what was said.
Terms explained to the client by {attorney} {date}.
The client signs. Nobody signs on the client’s behalf, and an unsigned settlement is not filed to be fixed later.
C&R signed by the client {date}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 14. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
The settlement and everything that explains its value, together. A filing the judge cannot value from the record is a filing that comes back.
C&R filed {date} with {N} reports.
Nothing has happened until the order comes. Thirty days of silence is worth chasing rather than waiting out.
Approval {received {date} / outstanding as at {date}}.
Two clocks from one document. The payment date the order sets, or thirty days if it sets none; and the twenty-day reconsideration window, computed from how the order was served.
Order approving served {date} by {method}. Payment due {date}; recon window to {date}.
And what happens next — when payment is expected and what they need to do. This is the call the client has been waiting for.
Client told of approval {date}.
When it does not arrive, that is the attorney’s question — an unreasonable delay carries a penalty and the file records the dates that show it.
Payment {received {date} / not received as at {date}}.
Future medical, and the five-year right to reopen. These are the reasons a case is stipulated rather than released, and the client should understand what they are keeping.
Terms explained {date}: future medical {open / closed}; reopener rights explained.
The reports that explain the agreed rating. Stipulations need information rather than the full evidentiary record a C&R needs — but the judge still has to see how the figure was reached.
Supporting reports filed with the stipulations: {list}.
The stipulated percentage is compared with what the reports actually found. If the firm rates the case it rates from the findings, and any discrepancy is surfaced to the attorney rather than resolved on the file.
Stipulated {pct}; findings support {pct}. {Agreed / discrepancy raised {date}}.
Signed by the client, filed with the supporting record.
Stipulations signed {date}, filed {date}.
Nothing is decided until the award issues.
Award {received {date} / outstanding at {date}}.
Both clocks, computed from service. And leave the five-year clock open — the award does not close it.
Award served {date} by {method}. Payment {date}; recon to {date}. Five-year clock remains open to {date}.
The award, the payment, and — plainly — that future medical and the reopener remain. Clients routinely believe a stipulated case is finished.
Client told of the award {date}; open rights explained.
Compromise and Release
signed by client
goes to the Board, with every relevant report
starts the judge’s review — approval, an Order Suspending Action, or a hearing
8 CCR 10700, 10789(e)
Every AME, QME and treating report relevant to adequacy is filed with it. Withholding them, or misstating that none exist, is prohibited.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The case endsthe judge wants more before approving
An Order Suspending Action on a settlement
2, 14 — an order or award approving or disapproving a settlement → 14; everything else → 2
The case endsthe defect is cured and it is resubmitted
the attorney sets the date
from the OSA
8 CCR 10700(b), 10789(e) · Gaines v. ABM Aviation (WCAB en banc, 2026)
A judge may NOT use an OSA to compel an evaluation, dismiss with prejudice, or cut a fee without notice and a record (Gaines, en banc 2026). Answer what it asks; do not read it as a refusal.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain routes work to others and had no owner on any step — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
An OSA names what is missing — a report, a fee declaration, a civil-case fact, a signature. It is a list, and it is answered item by item rather than by resubmitting the same settlement.
OSA served {date}. Asks for: {items}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 2. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
The settlement is not approved and is not dead. It sits pending, and anything that assumed approval — a payment diary, a closing letter — is held.
Attorney told {date}. Settlement of {date} pending; {items} held.
Medicals, civil-case facts, fee support. What the judge asked for and not more — an OSA is not an invitation to refile the whole thing.
Assembled for the OSA {date}: {what}.
The amended settlement goes back with the items supplied. What changed between the version the judge suspended and this one is recorded, because the file must be able to show it.
Resubmitted {date}. Changed from the {date} version: {what}.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The case is set for hearingthe matter is heard and decided
The case endsthe judge approves
Is it final, or interlocutory?the Board acts on the petition
An order, award or findings
2, 14 — an order or award approving or disapproving a settlement → 14; everything else → 2
Is it final, or interlocutory?a party challenges the decision
The injury gets worsean award exists, so new and further disability can be claimed
Money movesthe award is payable
The fee is decidedthe fee is decided with the award
20 days — +5 by mail, fax, e-mail or any method other than personal service to a California address; +10 elsewhere in the United States; +20 outside it, measured by the party’s Official Address Record. Only personal service gets the bare 20
from service of the final order, decision or award
LC 5903; 8 CCR 10605(a)–(b), 10940, 10945
20 days on personal service ordinarily · 25, 30 or 40 by other methods as the exception. Only personal service to a California address gets the bare twenty. Mail, fax or e-mail adds five; elsewhere in the United States ten; outside it twenty. The method is read off the proof of service.
60 days
from transmission of the case to the Appeals Board — service of the judge’s Report & Recommendation is the notice of it
LC 5909(a)–(b) · Perez v. Chicago Dogs (WCAB en banc, 2025)
Every order, without exception. The window is short and it starts from service, which may already have been some days ago.
{Order type} dated {date}, served {date}, received {date}. Attorney told {date}.
Both. The method decides whether the window is twenty, twenty-five, thirty or forty days, and it is read off the proof of service rather than assumed from the envelope.
Served {date} by {method} to {address type}. Window closes {date}.
In plain terms, on the file: what was ordered, in whose favour, and on what issues. An order nobody can summarise is an order somebody has to re-read every time it comes up.
Order decides: {what}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 2. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
With the computed date attached. Whether to seek reconsideration, whether it is removal instead, or whether to accept it — all theirs. The file supplies the date and the document.
Recon window to {date} put to the attorney {date}.
Final or interlocutory, and whether a ground exists. A decision NOT to seek reconsideration is recorded with its date and its reason — an unrecorded decision is indistinguishable from a missed deadline, and the twenty days do not come back.
Reconsideration {sought / not sought} {date}. Reason: {…}.
The date the award sets, or a thirty-day check where it sets none.
Payment due {date} per the award.
What the order says, in plain language. Not what it means for their case going forward — that is the attorney’s conversation and often depends on decisions not yet made.
Client advised of the order {date}.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The Board decidesa party challenges the decision
An order that decides something
2, 14 — an order or award approving or disapproving a settlement → 14; everything else → 2
The Board decidesthe Board acts on the petition
—
from —
Vazquez v. Renteria (WCAB en banc, 2025); 8 CCR 10955(a)
Two different routes with different timetables, and the file cannot tell which. A final order decides a substantive right or a threshold issue — injury arising out of employment, jurisdiction, employment, the statute. Evidence, discovery, trial setting and venue are interlocutory. The attorney decides.
Reopen, reconsideration, removal, terminate, commutation, penalties. Everything else on this page depends on it, and the file name should carry it.
Petition {type} filed by {party} {date}.
Ours or theirs. A petition is always attorney work.
Attorney told {date}.
An answer to a petition for reconsideration is ten pages and has its own period. Put the date in front of the attorney with the document.
Answer window to {date}; attorney told.
A petition for reconsideration is verified and served with a proof of service. File it in EAMS or with the district office.
Petition filed {date}, verified, served on {parties}; POS filed.
On a reconsideration petition its service is notice that the case went up, and it starts the Board’s own sixty days.
R&R {served {date} → Board’s 60 days to {date} / not served as at {date}}.
Behind the pleadings, named for what it is. It is not correspondence and it is not part of the Application.
{132a petition / SIBTF application} filed {date}.
A §132a rests on what the employer did and when — termination dates, communications, the timing against the claim. A SIBTF application rests on the earlier disability: its records, its ratings, its dates. Both are evidence-gathering the file can do while the attorney frames the pleading.
Assembled for {proceeding}: {what}.
For a §132a, the date of the act complained of. For a SIBTF application, the dates of the prior injury and its resolution.
Key dates: {list}.
A collateral proceeding is the thing most easily forgotten on a busy file, because nothing routine touches it.
Status as at {date}: {…}.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
A letter arrives from the other sideit concerns a payment, a rate or a benefit
The Board decidesthe award is payable
The fee is decidedthe fee is paid from the award
Checks, EOBs, mileage, bills
1, 10, 11 — the claim itself (acceptance, denial, delay) → 1; a rate, an offer or a voucher → 10; a check → 11
The case closes and the file does notthe last payment clears and no clock is left running
14 days — thereafter a ten per cent self-imposed increase attaches to the late payment
from the fourteenth day after the employer learns of the injury
LC 4650(a), (d)
LC 4650(a) and (d) are not in AAI-STD 1. They are stated in The Blackletter on California Workers’ Compensation (2026), which quotes the Appeals Board’s en banc decisions verbatim — Farris and Messele both discuss the LC 4650(d) increase. The fourteen days and the ten per cent are the statute’s; the firm should confirm the current text before relying on either.
No deadline attaches to a payment record, and that is deliberate — tasking somebody on every cheque stub buries the tasks that matter. But a demand or a penalty is built from this ledger, so a gap in it is a gap in the argument.
Amount, date, what it was for, who paid it. That is the whole routine task on this tab and it is the one that makes the rest possible.
Payment {amount} dated {date} for {what}, from {payer}. Logged.
Under its OWN date, at tab 11. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
A rate that changed without explanation, a gap in a run of payments, a payment for something the file does not recognise. Not an argument — a note, for whoever asks later.
Noted: {what looks irregular}.
A demand about temporary disability or a penalty is built from this ledger. It is only useful if it is right on the day the demand is drafted.
Payment history current as at {date}: {N} entries.
the attorney picks the date; late here is a decision, not an accident
The Board decidesthe fee is decided with the award
A settlement or award is filed
Money movesthe fee is paid from the award
—
from —
LC 4906(a), (d); 8 CCR 10844 · Gaines (en banc, 2026)
No fee is demanded or accepted until the Board approves it. A disputed fee does not have to hold up the settlement.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain has a date somebody must act on and named nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
What the firm did, and when. The support is the record of the work, not an assertion about its value.
Fee support assembled {date}: {what}.
What is asked for is the attorney’s. No fee is demanded or accepted before the Board approves it, and a disputed fee does not have to hold up the settlement — it can be held in trust and heard later.
Fee request set at {amount} {date}; {filed with the settlement / deferred}.
The approved figure, not the requested one. They are frequently different and the file must show which is which.
Fee approved {amount} by order of {date}. Requested was {amount}.
the clock started before this reached the desk — how much is left?
The treating doctor decides somethinga provider treated and can claim against the case
A lien for services the provider says it gave
The case is set for hearingthe lien is set for conference
The case closes and the file does notthe liens are resolved and nothing is outstanding
18 months for services on or after 1 July 2013; 3 years for earlier services
from the date the services were provided
LC 4903.5(a), 4903.05
Already runningThis period did not start when this chain did. It has been running since the date the services were provided — before the case reached this page, and in most files before the firm was retained. What is left is what matters, and the answer is on the file, not on this page.
18 months ordinarily · 3 years for services before 1 July 2013 as the exception. Eighteen months for services on or after 1 July 2013. Three years for earlier services — which still arrive on old cases. The DATE OF SERVICE decides, not the date of the lien.
the date on the notice
from the notice
8 CCR 10875, 10888
Eighteen months from the SERVICE date, not from anything the case did — and 548 days is the longest period in the standard. Without the declaration under penalty of perjury the lien is dismissed by operation of law, which is worth noticing early rather than at the conference.
Claimant, amount, the services claimed and their dates. Liens are managed as a list, and a lien not on the list is a lien discovered at settlement.
Lien logged: {claimant}, {amount}, services {dates}.
Under its OWN date, at tab 15. The TYPE code decides the tab, which is what the code is for. A document acted on before it is filed is a document somebody is working from a copy of, and the copy is the one that gets annotated.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
Compare the service dates against the filing date — eighteen months for services from July 2013, three years before that. Record the comparison; whether to act on it is the attorney’s.
Services {dates}; lien filed {date}; {within / beyond} the period. For the attorney.
The file records whether the lien was filed inside its period and whether the declaration under penalty of perjury is there. Whether to raise either is the attorney’s, and a lien not objected to is a lien that stands.
Lien of {date}: {timely / out of time}, declaration {present / absent}. {Objection raised {date} / no objection}.
Without the declaration under penalty of perjury the lien is dismissed by operation of law. Its absence is worth noticing early rather than at the conference.
Declaration {present / absent}; filing fee {paid / not evidenced}.
Do the dates fall in the treatment period? Are the body parts the ones in issue? A lien for treatment on a body part never pleaded is a different conversation from one that is simply large.
Services {consistent / inconsistent} with the treatment record: {detail}.
It is an appearance and somebody has to make it.
Lien conference {date} calendared to {who}.
Liens are what a settlement has to deal with. The list is only useful if it is right on the day the settlement is drafted.
Lien list current as at {date}: {N} liens, {total}.
our filing, on a clock nobody chose — miss it and the claim is barred
The Board decidesan award exists, so new and further disability can be claimed
New and further disability appears after an award
The case opens at the Boarda petition to reopen restarts the case
five years
from the date of injury
LC 5410
Already runningThis period did not start when this chain did. It has been running since the date of injury — before the case reached this page, and in most files before the firm was retained. What is left is what matters, and the answer is on the file, not on this page.
On a CUMULATIVE TRAUMA this phrase names two dates. The injury has a period start and a period end, and anything computed from the date of injury uses the END date. Both dates go on the file; neither is used silently.
After five years from the date of injury the Board loses jurisdiction to award new and further disability. An award already made does not extend it.
Five years from the DATE OF INJURY, not from the award. It survives a stipulated award, which is why stipulations were chosen over a release — and clients routinely believe a stipulated case is finished.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because a limitation period with no owner and no due date is the one place that gap is not survivable — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
Five years from the DATE OF INJURY, not from the award — and on a cumulative trauma from the period end date. It survives a stipulated award, which is why the diary is set when the case appears to close.
LC 5410 jurisdiction ends {date}, five years from {date of injury}. Diary set.
Whether anything has changed since the award — new treatment, a worsening, a new body part. A year is enough time to obtain a report if there is one to obtain.
Five-year review {date}: {changed / no change}. {Action}.
Clients routinely believe a stipulated case is finished. The letter states the date and asks whether anything has changed — it states no view about whether a petition lies.
Client told {date} that the five-year period ends {date}.
New and further disability is the attorney’s judgement on the medical evidence. A decision not to petition is recorded with its date.
Petition to reopen {filed / not filed} {date}. Reason: {…}.
Petition (reconsideration, removal, reopen, penalties)
signed by attorney
goes to the Board, served with a proof of service
starts reconsideration: the Board’s 60 days from transmission; the answer is due within its own period
LC 5909; 8 CCR 10940
A petition for reconsideration is VERIFIED. The verification is its own page with its own caption and a declaration under penalty of perjury, and a proposed order travels with it as a separate document.
our filing, on a clock nobody chose — miss it and the claim is barred
The case opens at the Boardthe facts support serious and willful misconduct
the attorney decides the facts may support a petition under LC 4553
The case is set for hearingthe petition is set for hearing
one year
from the date of injury
LC 5407(a)
Already runningThis period did not start when this chain did. It has been running since the date of injury — before the case reached this page, and in most files before the firm was retained. What is left is what matters, and the answer is on the file, not on this page.
On a CUMULATIVE TRAUMA this phrase names two dates. The injury has a period start and a period end, and anything computed from the date of injury uses the END date. Both dates go on the file; neither is used silently.
A petition filed after the year is barred. The underlying case is not — it continues under its own period — but the additional 4553 recovery is gone.
The one-year period runs from the DATE OF INJURY and is not extended by the statute that extends the ordinary claim period. A case still perfectly alive under LC 5405 can be too late for a 4553 petition.
LC 5407(a) and LC 4553 are not in AAI-STD 1. Unlike every other citation on this page, they have not been checked against primary text by the standard’s verification record. Confirm the period against the Labor Code before relying on it.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because a limitation period with no owner and no due date is the one place that gap is not survivable — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
The date of injury, and on a cumulative trauma the period END date. LC 5407 is not extended by the statute that extends the ordinary claim period, so this date is computed once and diarised, not recomputed later.
S&W period: one year from {date of injury}. Diary set for {date}.
Whether the facts may support a petition is the attorney’s, and it needs deciding while there is still time to investigate. Six months before is a diary entry, not a deadline.
S&W question put to the attorney {date}; {pleading / not pleading / to review}.
What the employer knew, and when. Statements, prior incidents, safety records. The petition is a pleading of facts, not an assertion.
S&W facts assembled {date}: {sources}.
A decision not to plead it is recorded with its date and reason. An unrecorded decision is indistinguishable from a missed one.
S&W petition {filed / not pleaded} {date}. Reason: {…}.
the attorney picks the date; late here is a decision, not an accident
The case opens at the Boarda prior permanent disability is in play
a prior permanent disability combines with this injury
The case is set for hearingthe Fund claim is set for hearing
A separate claim against the Fund, filed against a different party. It has its own application and its own notice of representation, which is why they belong on their own chain rather than in with intake.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet, so these tasks carry no owner and no due date. They are the steps the statute requires; who does them, and by when, is a decision the firm has not recorded.
our filing, on a clock nobody chose — miss it and the claim is barred
The carrier answers the claimthe injured worker dies
The firm learns the injured worker has died
The case opens at the Boardthe dependants file their own application
The case endsthe dependency claim resolves
one year from death, and no later than 240 weeks from the injury
from the date of death
LC 5406(b)
Already runningThis period did not start when this chain did. It has been running since the date of death — before the case reached this page, and in most files before the firm was retained. What is left is what matters, and the answer is on the file, not on this page.
A dependants’ claim filed after the period is barred. It is a separate claim with its own applicants; the injured worker’s own case ending does not preserve it, and nothing about the existing file extends it.
This is NOT the same case. The applicants are the DEPENDENTS, the benefit is theirs, and who is a dependent — and whether wholly or partially — is a question of fact at the date of injury, not of who survives. Continuing the existing case in the deceased’s name is the error.
LC 5406(b) and the death-benefit provisions are not in AAI-STD 1. Unlike every other period on this map they have not been checked against primary text by the standard’s verification record. Confirm the period and the dependency rules before relying on them.
No page in the procedure manual covers a death claim. These tasks were written for this map because the library can produce the settlement and nothing described the claim — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
The date is the one the limitation period runs from, and where it came from matters — a family telephone call is not a certificate. The certificate is requested the same day.
Death recorded {date}, learned {how} on {date}. Certificate {requested/held}.
A deposition, an evaluation, a scheduled appointment. They are cancelled or held, not left to fail on the day.
Held pending death claim: {items}, {date}.
Whether a death claim lies, who may bring it and what becomes of the existing case are all the attorney’s. The file records the death and the date; it states no view on any of that.
Attorney told {date}.
Dependency is decided at the date of injury, and total and partial dependants are treated differently. This is fact-gathering — relationships, household, support — not a conclusion about who qualifies.
Dependency facts gathered {date}: {who, relationship, household}.
One year from death, and the 240-week outer limit from the injury. Both dates go on the file because the earlier of the two governs.
Death claim period: one year to {date}; 240 weeks from injury to {date}.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
Money movesthe last payment clears and no clock is left running
A provider claims against the casethe liens are resolved and nothing is outstanding
The last clock has run, or the firm withdraws, or the client leaves
4 unless the letter is about one of these: to the judge → 2; to, from or about the evaluator → 6; a rating letter → 7; a payment, EOB or bill → 11; written discovery → 12; a records request → 13; an MSA → 14; a lien claimant → 15; intake, fee or address → cover
Closed is a status on the cover, never a reason to withhold a filing or a send. A UR denial arriving on a closed case is filed and appealed inside its own clock, and the note says the case was closed when it came. The reopening follows the filing rather than gating it.
A case closes when the last clock has run — the award paid, the appeal window passed, the liens resolved — or when the firm withdraws or the client leaves. The FILE does not close with it. Documents keep arriving on closed cases and some of them still carry a clock.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain names a period in its own prose and owned nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
The last clock run, the firm’s withdrawal, or the client leaving. Which it was decides what has to be served and what is still owed, and it is a fact the file will be asked for years later when nobody remembers.
Case closed {date}: {last clock run / withdrawal / client left}.
Closing is a document — the closing letter, the substitution, the final award with its payment proved. It is filed like any made document, under its own date, and the cover records the closing date.
Closing document {what} dated {date}, filed tab {tab}. Cover updated.
Two dates, not one: the end of the firm’s retention period, and the end of any LONGER period a document in the file requires — a minor’s matter, a future-medical award, a lien still open. The longer date governs the whole file. Nothing arrives to say this was missed, which is why it is clipped at closing rather than remembered.
Retention: firm period to {date}; longest document period to {date} ({why}). Governing date {date}.
A piece the procedure could not finish is not closed with the case. Each one is finished or its reason is recorded on the cover.
Pocket at closing: {N} pieces, {finished / recorded on the cover}.
A closed case still runs the standard. A document arriving on one is placed, named, clipped and reported exactly as on an open case, and the note says the case was closed when it came. A UR denial on a closed case carries its own window whatever the cover says; the reopening follows the filing rather than gating it.
Document {what} received {date} on a closed case; filed tab {tab}, clipped {date}, attorney told {date}.
Nothing is destroyed by the procedure. Destruction is a person’s decision under the firm’s retention rule and the client’s rights, and it is recorded on the cover with its date and its authority. The index survives the file — it is the record of what the file held.
Paper originals {returned to client / destroyed} {date} under {authority}. Index retained.
No template in the library. This is written from scratch, on a clock somebody else started.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
Anything happens the client should know
4 unless the letter is about one of these: to the judge → 2; to, from or about the evaluator → 6; a rating letter → 7; a payment, EOB or bill → 11; written discovery → 12; a records request → 13; an MSA → 14; a lien claimant → 15; intake, fee or address → cover
Facts only. No view on the merits, no estimate of value, and no deadline quoted to the client.
A letter about the evaluator belongs with the med-legal scheduling; about money, with the money; about records, with the subpoenas; about a settlement, with the settlement. Correspondence is what is left after those questions are asked, not the first place a letter is put.
Letter from {sender} dated {date}; filed at Tab 4 because {reason}.
An administrative question is answered by the case manager. A question about what the case is worth, what to accept, or what happens next is a position on the case and is the attorney’s. The file records which it was.
Client question of {date} answered {date} by {attorney / case manager}: {administrative / a position on the case}.
Most correspondence asks for something. Record what, and the date it wants it by — or set one where the letter does not.
Asks for {what} by {date, or none stated — set {date}}.
Ask, at the earliest opportunity. Who actually pays is not a detail — an award against an entity nobody identified may be unenforceable, and the duty to say is theirs, not ours to investigate.
Administrator {name} did not identify its principal. Disclosure requested {date}; attorney told.
Where the answer is administrative, answer it. Where it is a position on the case, it is the attorney’s. Do not let a letter sit because it is not obvious which.
Answered {date} / referred to the attorney {date}.
A change of defence counsel, adjuster or address goes on the contact record the day it is known. The next document served on a stale address is a document that did not arrive.
Contact updated: {what changed}.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
The firm serves any document
It starts no clock of its own and it SUPPLIES the date most other clocks run from. Sworn in the first person by whoever actually served it — never the attorney\u2019s name over another person\u2019s declaration.
Behind the same tab as the document, named so the pairing is obvious. A proof of service filed apart from its document is a proof of nothing anybody can find.
POS for {document} filed {date}.
This is the task that makes the rest of the manual work. Every deadline that runs from service needs both, and both live on this document.
Service of {document}: {date} by {method} to {address type}.
The declarant is the person who actually puts it in the post or sends it. Their name, in the first person. Not the attorney’s by default and not whoever prepared the document.
POS declarant {name}, served {date}.
Every party and every representative, at their current addresses. A party left off is a party who can say they never got it.
Served on: {list}. Addresses checked {date}.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
A party changes attorney, or the firm does
4 unless the letter is about one of these: to the judge → 2; to, from or about the evaluator → 6; a rating letter → 7; a payment, EOB or bill → 11; written discovery → 12; a records request → 13; an MSA → 14; a lien claimant → 15; intake, fee or address → cover
The next document served on a stale address is a document that did not arrive.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain has a date somebody must act on and named nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
Ours or theirs. Whose representation changed decides who must be served and what stops arriving.
Substitution {filed / received} {date}: {party} now represented by {who}.
This is the chain that decides where the mail goes. A stale contact record sends a document to the wrong firm and starts no clock at all — and nothing arrives to say it happened.
Contacts updated {date}: {who} added, {who} removed.
What they hold that the firm does not. A gap in the file discovered at a conference is a gap that should have been asked about here.
File requested from {who} {date}. Received {date} / outstanding.
A diary entry assigned to a person who has left, or a service list naming a firm no longer in the case. Both fail silently.
Clips reviewed {date}; {N} reassigned.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
Minutes, notices, acknowledgments
3 (a lien conference → 15)
Board paper is read before it is filed. Minutes can set a trial date; a notice can set the conference that closes discovery.
No page in the procedure manual covers this chain yet. These tasks were written for this map because the chain has a date somebody must act on and named nobody — they need an attorney’s reading before they are relied on.
Minutes, a notice, an acknowledgment, an order taking off calendar. What it IS decides whether anything runs from it, and the descriptor on the face is not always the answer.
Board paper dated {date} received {date}: {what it is}, {what it decided}.
The Board sets hearing dates, conference dates and dates to comply. A date the Board names is not a suggestion, and it is diarised with an assignee before the paper is filed.
Date named: {date} for {what}. Calendared to {who}.
An acknowledgment tells nobody anything. An order taking a case off calendar changes what happens next, and the difference is the attorney’s to read.
Attorney told {date} / no notice needed: {reason}.
An acknowledgment changes nothing. An order taking a case off calendar changes what happens next and what must be re-set. The file records which it was.
Board paper of {date} {changes {what} / changes nothing}.
The date on the document, not the date it arrived. A minute order filed under the receipt date sorts wrongly against everything else on the tab.
Filed tab {tab} under its own date {date}.
no statutory clock; it supplies the dates the other clocks run from
The firm needs a letterhead, envelope or cover sheet
Not case work. Listed because a template library holds a great many of them and a map that omits them is not a map of the library.
The release and the designation. Chasing a signature months later, when a records request or an appeal is waiting on it, costs far more than getting it at the start.
Authorization and representative designation signed {date}.
Signed, dated and complete. An unsigned form in the file looks like a signed one at a glance and is worth nothing.
Both forms verified signed and dated {date}.
Where anything that needs them can find them — a records request, an IMR packet, a subpoena.
Filed to the cover {date}.
An authorization executed for one custodian belongs with that request, not with the intake papers.
Authorization for {custodian} filed with the request {date}.
An authorization can lapse or be withdrawn. Where that happens, everything relying on it stops until it is replaced.
Authorization {current / expired {date} / revoked {date}}.